At the library I work at, I am helping facilitate the lending of a couple of items for a T.S. Eliot exhibit at the World Chess Hall of Fame here in St. Louis in May. They have asked for a couple of items whose editions would have likely been ones Eliot was familiar with or even read himself.
This whole situation of course made me want to revisit The Waste Land…
While Preludes is my favorite Eliot poem, and has remained so for years, I certainly appreciate the Waste Land more now than I did ten or so years ago when I first read it.
Honestly, I hated it the first time I read it.
But several readings later, and this latest the first in several years, I found a couple of places in section II: The Chess Game moving and thought-provoking:
Here the word “unguent”: a fantastically uncomfortable word that really affectively develops a discomfort and distaste for the reader. The word trips over the tongue, and any attempt to say it feels similar to when heavy perfumes not only arrest the nose but somehow assault the taste buds and get into the throat:

And here: I love the conflict of thought and word, the dichotomy between begging for thought, which implies not speech, and begging for speech which would imply thought has already happened. But here the speaker begs for speech then thought, but beyond that, wants thought but admits never to be able to know the other’s thought, but demands they think even when the thought can not be known to them or, at least, is not revealed to them.

Leave a Reply